Re: [atlarge-discuss] propose a nomination period...

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. wrote:

> <snip>
> With regard to the paypal matter, I have some thoughts on that, but I think
> that selecting a membership verification could be finalized after we
> establish a number of preliminary organizational objectives that are
> required to get us moving toward the goal we have for being here in the
> first place. Since there is some concern for who might be on the ML, why not
> elect a bootstrap panel (of 3 or so?) through open ballot on the ML? Once
> the panel is elected, it would be the task of the panel to guide the
> discussion through resolution of our preliminary organizational objectives,
> ground rules for discussion, mission statement drafting, etc. in a
> systematic manner.  
I am in favour of doing exactly this, but I'd prefer to have the ML 
subscriptions frozen ASAP and that voting be limited to the ML, if we 
were to go this route.  New subscribers to the ML *as of this date and 
time* would be  considered ON HOLD (i.e. not eligible) for this onlist 
election.

--Sotiris



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de