[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [atlarge-discuss] ELECTION REPORT



On 20:19 28/05/03, Abel Wisman said:
Now lets assume that those numbers all match, we now receive the tallies
from the watchdogs or a report that the tallies we received from anyone
are in agreement with their findings
No. You will receive all the watchdogs data. The list of the VIDs and the filtering program. The only thing you will not receive are the filtered data (the headers, html, etc. because there are the names of the voters in them). Watchdogs cannot see them because they not elected but self nominated.

The analysis and use of fthe filtering program will show you there is no twist (you will be able to use to run the tallies yourself if you want or to use a grep or whatever you want ...). I will provide the exe. And Bruce and Eric will be able to check the possible discrepancies that would be reported.

I am glad that eventually a pro came in and talked about the real things. I did not run this on icannatlarge.org but on execlub.org because we have root powers on icannatlarge.org and I do not know who may also have them. Everyone can check that execlub.org is run on a commecial server where it is hosted and I have no root powers.

You remark and analysis only shows that you are a professional and that Sotiris is not one. You are a candidate so you are one of the first concerned by the filtering program. Tell it and I copy it to you right now (or in the morning if I am left). I am sure that Tobias could also understand that. Who else is a pro ready to help and report the community?

jfc








---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de