Re: [atlarge-discuss] Quorum requirements poll

["Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sotiris Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To: "Sotiris Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
Cc: "At Large Discuss" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Quorum requirements poll


> 
> 
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> 
> > Fellow Panelists et al.,
> >
> > Congratulations.
> >
> > Let's jump right into things and decide the quorum requirement.
> >
> > I propose a quorum of 4 of the 11 panel members.  Since it appears as 
> > if the number of the panel is somehow arbitrarily set at 11, I think 
> > we should avoid the mistakes of the past and make the quorum 
> > requirement easy to fulfil to effectively transact the business of the 
> > organization.
> >
> >
> > Please indicate (with an X) the number of panelists which ought to be 
> > required for quorum:
> >
> > 1. []
> > 2. []
> > 3. []
> > 4. []
> > 5. []
> > 6. [X]
> > 7. []
> > 8. []
> > 9. []
> > 10.[]
> > 11.[] 
> 
> 
> --Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de