[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"

To: debate@fitug.de
Subject: Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: 14 Apr 2001 11:57:14 +0200
Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
In-Reply-To: <20010414110500.A622@rotfl.franken.de> (dietz@rotfl.franken.de's message of "Sat, 14 Apr 2001 11:05:00 +0200")
References: <3AD6F2A8.18157.152221@localhost><20010413155648.A22974@rotfl.franken.de><20010413175444.B4762@sobolev.does-not-exist.org><20010413231351.A630@rotfl.franken.de><20010414010803.F8522@sobolev.does-not-exist.org><20010414110500.A622@rotfl.franken.de>
Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7

dietz@rotfl.franken.de writes:

> WARUM? Wer möchte sich freiwillig Dinge wie PGP > 2.x anschauen?

Aus den gleichen Gründen wie bei PGP 2.x auch? Alle Versionen IIRC
nach 2.3 sind nicht einmal ansatzweise freie Software.

References:
- [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
  - From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
  - From: dietz@rotfl.franken.de
- Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
  - From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
  - From: dietz@rotfl.franken.de
- Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
  - From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
  - From: dietz@rotfl.franken.de
- Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
  - From: dietz@rotfl.franken.de

Prev by Date: Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
Next by Date: Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
Prev by thread: Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
Next by thread: Re: [FYI] MS: "Closed source is more secure"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread