[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] VB on elections for ICANN board members
- To: atlarge discuss list <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] VB on elections for ICANN board members
- From: Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 03:58:08 +0900
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <B93E0583.C40D%fausett@lextext.com>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <inbhhusmtu09eviei17tt1mlr6ka8gup73@4ax.com>
I also support Vittorio's pragmatic approach. I have as much frustration
and complaint as many of you have about the way they handled the
AtLarge, but just denying A to Z brings us nowhere, unfortunately.
Being in Romania, I feel some lessons from history, before and after
the communist regime.
izumi
At 11:33 02/06/25 -0700, Bret Fausett wrote:
>I agree with Vittorio's approach.
>
>Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:50:11 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> >> Right now: VB is you can't have individuals elect ICANN board members.
> >
> > No, please. You even asked me an explicit clarification about this. I said
> > that individuals should elect board members, but that since this is not
> > achievable in the present situation as the ICANN Board will never accept it
> > and no external force will likely act to make them accept it, we should try
> > at least to get some more realistic targets. For example, an At Large
> > council or committee elected by individuals, which in turn elects some board
> > or NomCom members.
> >
> > Anyway, the quarrel closes here. There is a basic divergence of ideas: while
> > we both are unhappy by what ICANN has been doing in the last years with the
> > At Large issue, you think we should not interact with them any more but for
> > complaining, I think we should still work to get as much as possible in the
> > new scenario that will be defined in the next two days. I won't convince you
> > of my opinion and you won't convince me of yours. Correct?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de