[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] news from bucharest: at large existsagain
- To: Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] news from bucharest: at large existsagain
- From: James Love <james.love@cptech.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:25:04 -0400
- CC: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <3D1B0A1C.6010806@cptech.org> <qe0mhu4jvc7vfbfaqu7ei40u70un85ke81@4ax.com> <5.0.2.5.2.20020627224239.02b60778@anr.org> <5.0.2.5.2.20020627225514.02b6a4f8@anr.org>
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
Izumi was quite clear he spoke for himself. VB was not. VB spoke as chair
of icannatlarge.com.
Jamie
Izumi AIZU wrote:
> Dear Todd,
>
> This approach is often used, to show where you belong to, but also
> indicates that
> the comment or opinion does not represent that body officially.
>
> That was my intention. If it gave any misunderstanding to you, sorry
> about that.
>
> izumi
>
> At 06:47 02/06/27 -0700, todd glassey wrote:
>
>
>> > ---------------
>> > As one of 7 elected members of interim panel of icannatlarge.com, but
>> > speaking only for
>> > myself now, I like to point out the strong need for the recognition and
>> > implementation
>> > of At-Large participatory structure by the Board which will lead the
>> > appropriate allocation
>> > of decision-making position at the Board level to At-Large.
>>
>> Aizu-san - SO this says "Since I am one of the officials, but here I am
>> only speaking for myself..." - Either you are speaking as one of the
>> seven
>> or as a private citizen, so which is it and why mention the other
>> status if
>> you are not speaking from it as well?
>>
>> >
>> > In some countries and cultures, without invitation or recognition,
>> people
>> > will anyway
>> > speak up and demand their interests be included in decision-making. In
>> > other parts of the
>> > world however, it is more difficult to expect that to happen. They
>> tend to
>> > wait. So if you
>> > do not consciously "reach-out" to the users, individual and others, and
>> > provide adequate
>> > incentives for participation and representation, ICANN will definitely
>> > become like an
>> > ordinary trade association dominated by providers. I think that is not
>> > healthy and will
>> > give harm to the providers themselves.
>> >
>> > Finally, as we are working hard to self-organize the at-large members
>> > globally, I again
>> > like to call for the formal adoption of At-Large participation
>> mechanism
>> > and therefore
>> > welcomes the idea of At-Large Advisory Committee as the first one small
>> > step for us
>> > here now, but hope it to become the one giant leap for ICANN and all
>> the
>> > players in
>> > the long run globally.
>>
>> So what was the result of this commntary by you?
>
>
> People listened to it, no question came in. There are some 25 to 30
> people making comments in line.
>
> izumi
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
>
--
------
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de