[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [atlarge-panel] elections
- To: James Love <james.love@cptech.org>, Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [atlarge-panel] elections
- From: Bret Fausett <fausett@lextext.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:10:09 -0700
- CC: <atlarge-panel@lists.fitug.de>, Untitled 4 <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <3D1B2992.9080604@cptech.org>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309
Is it either/or? Let's take what the Board gives us now, recognizing that
it's better than nothing, but continue building the system for trustworthy,
cost-effective elections. Once that's done, we'll push to have the election
system formally recognized.
James Love wrote:
> ICANN itself will not tolerate an at large election process. Some members
> of the panel are willing to endorse this as progress, others may feel it a
> cynical and manipulative effort to undermine the legitamcy of elections, and
> they may want to build up a system for elections, and push to be recognized
> in some way.
>
> Jamie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de