[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [atlarge-panel] elections
- To: Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [atlarge-panel] elections
- From: James Love <james.love@cptech.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:04:50 -0400
- CC: atlarge-panel@lists.fitug.de, discuss<atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <E17NUlM-0000Vx-00@ask.imv.au.dk> <3D1AEB1A.D0AC3E4E@hermesnetwork.com> <5.0.2.5.2.20020627233753.01dbba18@anr.org>
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
ICANN itself will not tolerate an at large election process. Some members
of the panel are willing to endorse this as progress, others may feel it a
cynical and manipulative effort to undermine the legitamcy of elections, and
they may want to build up a system for elections, and push to be recognized
in some way.
Jamie
Izumi AIZU wrote:
> Correct me if I am wrong. I don't know out of 6 members remaining on the
> panel
> who is endorsing the elimination of elections.
>
> I suggested after your resignation to achieve both, bylaws preparation AND
> election by the original deadline of July 24. There was a discussion yes
> here to consider the extension of deadline into before Shanghai, but that
> was not agreed by anyone.
>
> In fact Vittorio Wolfgang and myself discussed this lunch time to
> proceed the election and bylaws mandate be done by the original
> deadline and that is why I think it is better to ask YJ to join
> the interim panel unless Jamie comes back to work together
> which is more than welcome.
>
> So, please Jamie, do not vend the fact but make it straight
> to achieve common goal. But I think we need more resources to
> make a successful election, rather than criticizing each other on
> the list.
>
> izumi
>
>
>
> At 10:31 02/06/27 -0400, James Love wrote:
>
> Given the fact that some members of the current "temporary" board are
> now endorsing the elimination of elections, and will be going to
> Shanghi, I think it is important to test their support in an election.
>
>> Jamie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
>
--
------
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de