Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [atlarge-panel] elections

[Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>]

I see Jamie, there was a confusion on my part (and perhaps yours, too).

The election you meant was the ICANN Board election from AtLarge, NOT the
election of icannatlarge.com full panel members. Then I at least can
now understand what you mean.  Or do you still mean both?

This may be a typical case how it is not easy for non-English
native people to talk with English native. Both needs good
care.

izumi


At 11:04 02/06/27 -0400, James Love wrote:
>ICANN itself will not tolerate an at large election process.   Some 
>members of the panel are willing to endorse this as progress, others may 
>feel it a cynical and manipulative effort to undermine the legitamcy of 
>elections, and they may want to build up a system for elections, and push 
>to be recognized in some way.
>
>Jamie
>
>
>
>Izumi AIZU wrote:
>>Correct me if I am wrong. I don't know out of 6 members remaining on the panel
>>who is endorsing the elimination of elections.
>>I suggested after your resignation to achieve both, bylaws preparation AND
>>election by the original deadline of July 24. There was a discussion yes
>>here to consider the extension of deadline into before Shanghai, but that
>>was not agreed by anyone.
>>In fact Vittorio Wolfgang and myself discussed this lunch time to
>>proceed the election and bylaws mandate be done by the original
>>deadline and that is why I think it is better to ask YJ to join
>>the interim panel unless Jamie comes back to work together
>>which is more than welcome.
>>So, please Jamie, do not vend the fact but make it straight
>>to achieve common goal. But I think we need more resources to
>>make a successful election, rather than criticizing each other on
>>the list.
>>izumi
>>
>>At 10:31 02/06/27 -0400, James Love wrote:
>>   Given the fact that some members of the current "temporary" board are 
>> now endorsing the elimination of elections, and will be going to 
>> Shanghi, I think it is important to test their support in an election.
>>
>>>    Jamie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>
>
>
>--
>------
>James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
>http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
>voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de