[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALOC archives?



On 02:02 a.m. 24/07/2002 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com said:
>Bruce,  I and probably many many others will strongly take issue with your
>remark that << ISOC is not a user organization.  It is primarily a trade
>organization for the Internet industry >>
>
>But this is probably not the appropriate venue for such discussions.  If you
>don't mind taking this off-list, I will be happy to discuss this with you
>further at great length.

Danny,

I think this is very much the appropiate venue for such discussions, and 
the election time is an appropriate time too with one of our candidates 
sitting on the ALOC as ISOC, not as icannatlarge.

Taking ISOC off-list now resembles an intervention by Dave Crocker, when I 
raised ISOC in the old IDNO,
a long time ago:

>From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
>Subject: Re: [IDNO:274] with copy to Don Heath
>Cc: "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>, <idno@radix.co.nz>,
>heath@isoc.org
>
>
>At 12:04 PM 6/12/99 +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >The only thing I remember is that I said that sadly Don Heath chose not to
>
>
>Joop, and everyone else,
>
>Let me strongly encourage you all to stop this, and similar, threads
>immediately.
>
>It has nothing to do with the focus of this group and is sure to take
>energy away from that focus and to add little but emotion.
>
>The easiest way to stop the thread is for everyone simply to stop. No
>responses to joop's note. No responses to my note. Just return to the
>main programming.
>
>d/

--Joop


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de