[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Update on ALOC
- To: Vittorio Bertola <vb@vitaminic.net>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Update on ALOC
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:58:49 -0700
- CC: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de, denise michel <denisemichel@sbcglobal.net>, Esther Dyson <edyson@edventure.com>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <qkssjuoj4o2b35kao8pfusd0iqei4ahoun@4ax.com>
Vittorio and all stakeholders or other interested parties,
Thank you for this off the cuff update and info Vittoro.
Is there a URL reference for this report? If so,
can you perhaps point us to it. If not, will there be
and if so, when?
Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> Just a quick report on what is happening in the ALOC.
>
> Denise Michel posted a first document with a raw list of operational
> points about the implementation of the ALAC that should form the
> ALOC's first submission to the ERC (as you saw, on last Saturday the
> ALOC has been given up to tomorrow to produce it... and of course many
> complained about this).
>
> Hans Klein answered with the proposal of inserting these point into a
> more general scheme in which we first stress that we don't agree with
> the overall change and we would prefer the original scheme, with At
> Large elections for the original board, and then we go to the
> operational proposals about the ALAC. This approach has been supported
> by many, including Peter Shane, me, Sotiris Sotiropoulos and Izumi
> Aizu. We also insisted on the fact that there is clear support for
> elections in the community and this should be mentioned.
>
> I then submitted another revised draft with some additional points,
> including the facts that the user organizations participating to the
> ALAC should not be required to fund ICANN, that only the ALAC itself,
> not the Board, should establish criteria for accepting such
> organizations in the ALAC, that organizations should be able to prove
> their membership numbers and not just to claim them, and that we
> should ask for at least four members in the NomCom.
>
> Now discussion is ongoing. I've just asked confirmation of the fact
> that messages and documents on ALOC's working list are to be
> considered public, so that I can actually forward them outside of the
> Committee.
> --
> vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
> ----------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <--------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de