FW: [atlarge-discuss] Revised ALAC report submission schedule 1.1

["Jkhan" <Jkhan@MetroMgr.com>]

Lawrence,

>Perhaps you could outline for us the steps that would be required to
>replace, ICANN?  At first blush,

1. Get the Students of Lawrence B. Solum, involved in creating a
Constitution for a new iGovenment. Then I would not hold Moot Court this
fall semester, opting instead to hold an iConstitutional Competition.

>I do not see how this could be accomplished.  How,
>for example, would the IANA functions be transferred?

2. The functions and responsibility would be 'delegated' with an
oversight Committee (Art. I sec 8 ( McCulloch v. Maryland), and
incorporated into the iGovernment.

>What, if any, would the role of DOC and the ccTLD managers be in
>effectuating the transfer?

3. The real-world DOC would participate in a diminished role by terms of
a treaty with the IGov, but the functions of the iDoC and the U.N.
Counsel of ccTLDs would be assimilated and functions optimized.


Lawrence, a man of your stature knows better than to prod with these
questions. You have the knowledge and capacity to recognize that We have
arrived at a very unique place & time. You and Fellow members of the
Robe, are in a position to help. It would be a deep travesty should you
not contribute to our efforts.

James Khan


-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence B. Solum [mailto:Lawrence.Solum@lls.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:47 AM
To: eric@hi-tek.com; Bret Fausett
Cc: Untitled 4
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Revised ALAC report submission schedule

Eric,

Perhaps you could outline for us the steps that would be required to
replace
ICANN?  At first blush, I do not see how this could be accomplished.
How,
for example, would the IANA functions be transferred?  What, if any,
would
the role of DOC and the ccTLD managers be in effectuating the transfer?

LBS

----- Original Message -----
From: <eric@hi-tek.com>
To: "Bret Fausett" <fausett@lextext.com>
Cc: "Untitled 4" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Revised ALAC report submission schedule


> Bret,
>
> The answer is obvious.  We will build a group that can handle all the
questions.
>
> We have already had proud and proper elections and they are beginning
WGs
to
> handle all of these issues.
> We will do it in a representative open fashion.  It will replace ICANN
not
deal
> with it.
>
> Eric
>
> Bret Fausett wrote:
>
> > Judith, The question I asked was what those of you advocating
distancing
> > this effort from the ALAC would do instead to have a positive impact
on
> > ICANN's policies. Your response was to provide further criticism of
the
ALAC
> > and ICANN. A thousand people have joined this effort in order to
have an
> > effect, and the elected representatives ought not throw away their
goodwill.
> > You might try adding some mortar to the rocks you like to throw so
you
can
> > actually build something that lasts.
> >
> >       -- Bret
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de