Re: [atlarge-discuss] RE: [atlarge-panel] 006 Deciding Name - Resolution and Recommendation to Members

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Paul and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,

  Yes you certainly could read what Joanna said this way.  But
I am not sure that is how she intended it.  In that she now seems
reluctant to discuss it with me openly or with the other Panel
members as Michael indicated, perhaps we shall never know
exactly what she meant...  <Sigh>

Paul wrote:

> I suppose you could read it as ICANN must go, and there
> are two real alternatives, but just to make sure there is
> support for the change, the ICANN option is included
> too?
>
>         Paul
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
> > Michael and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,
> >
> >   Thank you Michael for following up on what I was trying to
> > get across to Joanna and other panel members as well as the
> > membership for about two weeks now.  I realize that Joanna
> > doesn't seem to wish to discuss this issue with me and it also
> > seems that she may be reluctant to do so now with the
> > members as well.
> >
> >   Again many thanks for you follow-up here Michael!  Well done!  >:)
> >
> > Michael Geist wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Joanna,
> >>
> >>We should absolutely ensure that there is membership support for the
> >>organization's name.  If the membership wants something without
> >>ICANN, I'll support that choice.
> >>
> >>That said, your response leaves me genuinely puzzled.  On Sunday you
> >>sent an email to the panel asking them to indicate their preference
> >>for three names -- icannatlarge, internetatlarge, and worldatlarge.
> >>The following day you now indicate that "ICANN must go" and that "We
> >>have two options on the table here - WorldAtLarge and
> >>InternetAtLarge."
> >>
> >>What has changed in 24 hours such that one of the choices has been
> >>removed?  We haven't heard from the entire panel, much less the
> >>membership.  Was the inclusion of icannatlarge as a choice a good
> >>faith choice?  When you say that "I would not be doing my job if I
> >>were to allow one side to rule this organization at the expense of
> >>the other", isn't that possibly exactly what you're doing when you
> >>say that ICANN is off the table before everyone is heard from?
> >>
> >>MG
>
> [SNIP]
>
> --
>   Paul the argumentative     ( notmyopinion@btinternet.com )
>    "Opinions expressed in this email are not necessarily incorrect."

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de