Re: [atlarge-discuss] Report to the ERC

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Bret and all assembly members, stakeholders or other interested parties,

  Sounds like a closed process and thereby contrived to a great
degree.  As such this would seem to be in direct violation of the
White Paper and especially the MoU.

Bret Fausett wrote:

> Danny,
>
> One point you should understand about these advisory committees is that it
> was not within our ability to propose solutions outside the boundaries of
> the Blueprint for Reform. At least in the names policy process group, we
> were expressly told that we were to assist the ERC with drafting the details
> of the Blueprint's plan, but not to deviate from the path specified in the
> Blueprint. At the same time, we were also told that we were free to advocate
> different solutions -- even contrary solutions -- on our own in other fora.
> So to the extent that you have a problem with the broad ideas in these
> drafts, your beef is with the Board and the Blueprint. In spite of the
> limitations placed on us, I personally thought it was worthwhile to work on
> the implementation details and make them better. I'm assuming that the At
> Large group was working under the same constraints.
>
>      -- Bret
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de