Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: at-large representativeness

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Whoa,
Technical needs are not the determination of value of something.
Wait, unless someone is running contrary to Antitrust and Monopoly concepts?
I guess if you get it for free and no one else can have it because of
government intervention, maybe the price should be reflective of actual costs
rather than greed.
(do not get me wrong I appreciate greed)

Eric

Stephen Waters wrote:

> > Stephen Waters <swaters@amicus.com> wrote:
> >
> > p.s., Honestly, I can't imagine any technical reason why domains cost
> > more than $5/year -- especially after reading the results of Karl
> > Auerbach's tests for millions of TLDs under BIND. DNS is just fucked.
>
> This is to what I was referring...
>
> http://www.atlargestudy.org/forum_archive/msg01528.shtml
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                        Name: signature.asc
>    signature.asc       Type: application/pgp-signature
>                 Description: This is a digitally signed message part


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de