Re: [atlarge-discuss] Shanghai

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Good point and therein lies the issue.
Also who is going to say it.
I definitely did not vote for an external spokesperson.
As a member of this group I would be deeply disturbed by someone representing us
at this point.
Urgency is counterbalanced by prudence,  there is nothing at Shanghai that is
not predetermined by staff.
Let us grow in legitimacy and strength before we set our policies to the outside
world.
We have had no vote on our positions with ICANN and no one should represent our
position until we do.

Eric

Norbert Klein wrote:

> > What does the next meeting of ICANN have anything to do with this group?
> >
> > e
>
> I would ask the other way round:
>
> What do we want to say to ICANN, whose board and constituencies are going to
> meet in Shanghai?
>
> Norbert
>
> --
> Norbert Klein
> Open Forum of Cambodia: www.forum.org.kh


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de