Re: [atlarge-discuss] Our New Name Isn't...

["J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

On 23:28 03/10/02, NameCritic said:
> My biggest problem with using the name that contains ICANN in it is that
> ICANN was given one year to clean up their act by the DoC. Let's assume, a
> really small assumption, that ICANN doesn't clean up their act, and let's
> assume, this time a really big assumption, that the DoC actually does shut
> them down, then we're stuck with a name that means nothing.
>
> Plan on being around even if ICANN isn't, or do you want to tie our fate to
> theirs?
What we may expect is:

- ICANN will get funded by ISOC through ".org"
- ICANN will be revised by the USG according to the Cybersecurity plan
- an adjustment is carried one year from now to adpt with possible name 
change to reflect that ICANN is merely concerned by its Contractors.

The name may change.
supportinh .org in tat context may be considered as supporting ICANN today

This is why we should stop considering names. Some wanted to vote over a 
name. A part of 19% of our members are ICANN nostalgic. Good. Let consider 
serious issues :-)

Seems that ICANN/NSI/hazard was cute enough in having icannatlarge.org on 
hold ...
We have ICANN-AT-LARGE.ORG, for clearer ... I paid for it until 2003 .....

jfc




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de