Re: [atlarge-discuss] web site

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 07:37 p.m. 3/10/2002 +0100, Richard Henderson wrote:

> All I'm asking is an immediate review of the status of icannatlarge.org
> (currently locked and on hold) and a simple YES or NO vote ... not to
> overturn democracy, but to clarify democracy... if people vote "YES" we
> would prefer to have a name without ICANN in it, then THAT'S not
> anti-democratic... that becomes the democratic will of the membership in an
> evolving and fluid situation, with new details coming to light
It disturbs me deeply to see such a statement from an advocate of democracy 
that I thought sincere.

The members *have* spoken.

They were presented with an already limited choice. Now you don't like the 
result, you want, like Joanna attempted during the polls,  to limit  the 
choice even further?

DN misconfiguration (funny that, icannatlarge.org  worked fine last March 
and even had a link, logging all traffic, to our icannatlarge.com website) 
is a most  feeble excuse that can be rectified in 10 minutes.

Has it not occurred to you  that it is ICANN staff  that would be most 
pleased seeing us walk away from the icann string and make ourselves 
irrelevant to them?   Saves them the effort.



--Joop


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de