Re: [atlarge-discuss] Shanghai

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Damned fine point and one we should consider.
e

Norbert Klein wrote:

> > Good point and therein lies the issue.
> > Also who is going to say it.
> > I definitely did not vote for an external spokesperson.
> > As a member of this group I would be deeply disturbed by someone
> > representing us at this point.
> > Urgency is counterbalanced by prudence,  there is nothing at Shanghai that
> > is not predetermined by staff.
>
> No problem with prudence. But prudence is one thing, and inactivity another.
>
> Everything predetermined by (ICANN) staff? Not quite - there is the very
> detailed statement of the DoC telling the ICANN board where it wants to see
> change during the next year.
>
> Shanghai is the first occasion for the ICANN board and its constituencies to
> face this challenge.
>
> > Let us grow in legitimacy and strength before we set our policies to the
> > outside world.
> > We have had no vote on our positions with ICANN
>
> We had no vote - unfortunately true, because we did not discuss the issues
> for which more than 1000 people signed up to this ICANNatlarge group.
>
> > and no one should represent our position until we do.
> >
> > Eric
>
>
> > Norbert Klein wrote:
> >
> > > > What does the next meeting of ICANN have anything to do with this
> > group?
> > > >
> > > > e
> > >
> > > I would ask the other way round:
> > >
> > > What do we want to say to ICANN, whose board and constituencies are
> > going to
> > > meet in Shanghai?
> > >
> > > Norbert
>
> --
> Norbert Klein
> Open Forum of Cambodia: www.forum.org.kh


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de