[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [atlarge-discuss] No quorum



On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 10:36, Hugh Blair wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DannyYounger@cs.com 
> > 
> > Voting closed on Saturday for the two motions:
> >     WEB SITE MANAGEMENT
> >     ICANNATLARGE.ORG
> > 
> > Both motions failed to achieve a quorum.  Neither motion passed.
> > http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-panel/0210/msg00096.html
> > 
> > Seems like the Panelists can't even be bothered to cast a 
> > vote, or to draft a set of bylaws for membership ratification.    
> > 
> > Someone remind me... what job were these folks elected to do?
> 
> Unfortunately, this is a common occurance in this field. Folks
> can email back and forth about important and non-important stuff,
> yet most can't be bothered to make a decision or confirm a
> position by voting. I've never understood this. If you want to
> be a part of an organization, why not vote? Maybe we need a 
> simple rule: Miss 1 vote, noted. Miss 2 votes? You're out. Gone.
> For at least a year. Gone as a voting member, yet you can 
> participate as a 'talking' member. 
> 
> Participate - or get out of the way.

Or at the very least, send a brief email stating how busy you are and
designating a proxy.

$0.02USD,
-s

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part