[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[atlarge-discuss] Re: FC: Bill Purdy asks Washington Post about "sucks" domain name
Bill and all,
Your welcome Bill! Yes I personally am a PURE free speech
advocate. And your right that such a position is the only consistent
position that one can take if they believe in the US Constitution,
freedom, and liberty for all. But as you know there are many
that would seek to take that basic right away. Let me know
if there is anything I or my organization can do to help you
in your struggle as we do have some resources available
that may be useful...
As Martin Luther King once said, "let freedom ring!"
William S. Purdy wrote:
> Dear Mr. Williams,
>
> I thank you so much for your support, not on my opinion that the Washington
> Post Aborts, but on my RIGHT to say it - and in a domain name. I think you
> are quite premature however in being glad that the Constitution is still the
> primary law of the land, as the Washington Post has not yet indicated its
> acquiescence to my using TheWashingtonPostSUCKS.com and may very well try to
> have me held in Contempt for merely reserving it. I will inform you and the
> world just as soon as I get a commitment from them one way or the other.
>
> You are a PURE free speech advocate, disagreeing with what I say, but
> defending to the death my right to say it anyway. A special "thank you" to
> you and your fellow PURE free speech advocates like Declan etc. It is what
> you and I do have in common, and after all it is the only consistent
> position one can take on free speech. I imagine I'll be seeing
> BillPurdySUCKS.com, BillPurdyISaWACKO.com and etc. before long - which is
> fine by me - and probably true anyway -ha!
>
> Thanks again,
> Bill Purdy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
> To: <declan@well.com>
> Cc: <politech@politechbot.com>; <wpurdy@attbi.com>; "atlarge discuss list"
> <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>; "icann board address"
> <icann-board@icann.org>; "Don Evans" <DEvans@doc.gov>; "Nancy J. Victory"
> <nvictory@ntia.doc.gov>; "cathy Handley" <chandley@ntia.doc.gov>; "Clyde
> Ensslin" <censslin@ntia.doc.gov>; "General Assembly of the DNSO"
> <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:53 AM
> Subject: Re: FC: Bill Purdy asks Washington Post about "sucks" domain name
>
> > Declan and all,
> >
> > Thank you Declan for passing this along. Well done!
> > I am glad to see that the US Constitution is still the primary law
> > of the land, and that it again confirms that CENSORSHIP
> > IN ALL OF IT'S FORMS IS WRONG! Mr Purdy, keep
> > up your good works here! And well done to you sir as well!
> >
> > That said and rightly confirmed, I do not believe that the Washington
> > Post "Sucks" or "Murders". But I also recognize that this is only
> > my opinion, and as such, in no way restricts any other individual or
> > group of individuals, from taking an opposing view publicly.
> >
> > Declan McCullagh wrote:
> >
> > > The Washington Post has been trying to get Bill Purdy held in contempt,
> > > with a hearing scheduled for Wednesday
> > > (http://news.com.com/2100-1023-961276.html) but it was postponed at the
> > > last minute because of the judge's schedule.
> > >
> > > Perhaps fearing wide redistribution of their filings, the newspaper's
> > > attorneys at Wilmer no longer seem to be emailing motions to Purdy. I do
> > > not have convenient versions to put online. Here are less-convenient JPG
> > > documents (the well.com versions will disappear soon; the ones on the
> > > Politech site are permanent):
> > >
> > > Washington Post nastygram to
> > > Purdy:
> > > http://www.well.com/user/declan/purdy-nastygram/
> > > http://www.politechbot.com/docs/purdy-nastygram.1002.tar.gz
> > >
> > > Judge's order siding with the paper:
> > > http://www.well.com/user/declan/purdy-order/
> > > http://www.politechbot.com/docs/purdy.order.100302.tar.gz
> > >
> > > Purdy's reply:
> > > http://www.politechbot.com/docs/purdy.reply.100602.doc
> > >
> > > Previous Politech message:
> > > http://www.politechbot.com/p-04037.html
> > >
> > > -Declan
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: William S. Purdy
> > > To: Alexandri, Maya
> > > Cc: Carome, Patrick ; fboyd@faegre.com ; Cliff Sloan ; William S. Purdy
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:39 PM
> > > Subject: www.TheWashingtonPostSUCKS.com
> > >
> > > Wed. 11:45 AM Oct. 9, 2002
> > >
> > > Dear Ms. Alexandri,
> > >
> > > When we spoke on the phone yesterday I informed you that I had just
> > > reserved the domain name http://www.TheWashingtonPostSUCKS.com . I
> asked
> > > you to comment on whether or not you felt that using that domain name
> was
> > > in compliance with the July 23, 2002 - September 5, 2002 Preliminary
> > > Injunction/Clarification? I informed you that I would wait a day or so
> for
> > > you to comment BEFORE I started using it. Please reply soon via email
> with
> > > your comments if you have any.
> > >
> > > I wish to remain in Perfect Compliance with the Preliminary
> > > Injunctions. In your Amended Proposed Preliminary Injunction Order
> > > submitted to the court you stated that you did NOT object to my
> ownership
> > > and use of www.ABORTWashingtonPost.com and www.WashingtonPostMURDERS.com
> > > . The Court agreed and subsequently, the Court did NOT require me to
> stop
> > > using those domain names and they are currently in full use by me. The
> > > Court also indicated to me in the record that any domain name with the
> word
> > > "SUCKS" in it is "Constitutionally protected", and Mr. Carome made
> similar
> > > references to that fact in the record during in his oral argumentto the
> > > court. You and your client have also chosen NOT to ask me to stop using
> > > www.WashingtonPostCENSORSHIP.com because you believe that such use by me
> is
> > > also NOT in violation of the Preliminary Injunctions and is also
> > > Constitutionally protected speech within a domain name. I continue to
> make
> > > full use of www.WashingtonPostCENSORSHIP.com and attach to it the
> webpage
> > > regarding the Washington Post's Editorial on Fox News Host Bill O'Reilly
> at
> > > http://www.billpurdy.com/oreilly.htm. I believe quite strongly, as do
> > > other learned people, that my use of www.TheWashingtonPostSUCKS.com
> would
> > > be in full compliance with the Preliminary Injunctions.
> > >
> > > Please immediately email me your comments regarding my reservation and
> > > intent to use www.TheWashingtonPostSUCKS.com. I intend to today
> either
> > > attach it to a "protest or critical commentary" website about the
> > > Washington Post that I design myself with a "TheWashingtonPostSUCKS
> > > Discussion Board", or I will submit it to the www.SUCKS.com website
> where a
> > > "WashingtonPostSUCKS Discussion Board" will be provided by www.SUCKS.com
> at
> > > the Sucks500.com Message Board probably at "Corporate America Sucks 500
> > > List (V-Z)". Please let me hear from you by 5:00PM Central today your
> > > comments and I will hold off on any use of
> www.TheWashingtonPostSUCKS.com
> > > until that time to hear from you.
> > >
> > > Yours truly,
> > >
> > > William S. Purdy
> > >
> > > cc: Declan McCullagh, Public Citizen, and several other news reporters
> and
> > > FREE SPEECH RIGHTS interested parties.
> > >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
> > > You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
> > > To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
> > > This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
> > > Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
> > > Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> >
> >
> >
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de