Re: [atlarge-discuss] Constitution

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Oh goody lord,
You have always been a gentlemen.
I never meant to suggest that your posts were wrongful.
I am not nice and pleasant.  And so what i meant was that I may have
offended
you.
e

Ron Sherwood wrote:

> Hi, Eric:
>
>     I cannot imagine how I hurt your feelings, and certainly did not intend
> to do so.   It was your dictionary reference that I used to defend my
> perspective.
>
>     Paragraphs two and four were addressing a point made separately by a
> respondent who claimed that because he/she understood the use of the word
> "constitution" differently, it was incorrect and should negate the value of
> David's entire work.
>
>     Please excuse my inadequate communication skills.
>
> Ron
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Dierker" <eric@hi-tek.com>
> To: "Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>
> Cc: "IAL" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Constitution
>
> > I agree with Ron, even though he hurt my feelings.
> > The name and sophistry is missplaced.
> > I kind of like the context
> > e
> >
> > Ron Sherwood wrote:
> >
> > > A rose by any other name...  smells as sweet.
> > >
> > > Those who live in the belief that only the dictionary that they are
> familiar with is correct, are bound to fail the test of international
> communications.
> > >
> > > I happen to believe that What David wrote from NZ is valid and legal in
> NZ.  The job of our Panel is couch a "Constitution" or whatever is chosen as
> its title, in terms that are as universally acceptable as possible, and
> legal in the jurisdiction in which we choose to incorporate.
> > >
> > > To claim that the title is incorrect simply demonstrates the
> intellectual limitations off the claimant.
> > >
> > > Please let us judge this draft document, and any others that are
> presented, by the value and relevance of their content and not by the
> language limitations of the reader.
> > >
> > > Constitution,  a : the basic principles and laws of a nation, state, or
> social group that determine the powers and duties of the government and
> guarantee certain rights to the people in it b : a written instrument
> embodying the rules of a political or social organization.
> > >
> > >     Do we not see ourselves as a political or social organization that
> should have a written instrument embodying the rules by which we operate?
> > >
> > > Ron
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de