Re: [atlarge-discuss] Membership

["Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>]

Good morning, Danny:

    I strongly believe that membership in our organization should be for
individuals only.  No individual should be excluded, but I do not think that
we were intended to become a trade organization.  Therefore any
representative of any commercial enterprise should be welcomed as an
individual, but no corporate memberships, please.

Ron

Danny Younger wrote:
>As we look forward toward the prospect of bylaws and a Charter, I think its
time that we had a real discussion on who is and who is not an At-Large
member.  We are generally agreed that membership in the At-Large is open to
both organizations and individuals... but does that mean, for example, that
Tucows or NeuStar are entitled to be an At-Large member?  How about Roger
Cochetti, the policy advisor for VeriSign... is he entitled to be an
At-Large
member?  What about the Business Constituency?  Is it entitled to call
itself
a member of the At-Large?  What about individual active BC members... can
they simultaneously be considered to be At-Large members?
----- Original Message -----
From: <DannyYounger@cs.com>
To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 2:33 AM
Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Membership




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de