Re: [atlarge-discuss] MOTION: WEBMASTER -- PASSED

["Hans Klein" <hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu>]

Joop,

Your proposed rules seem pretty reasonable.  I don't think it is our most 
urgent business to implement them, but I will try to get WG-WEB to focus on 
these matters in the coming weeks.

Hans


At 04:47 PM 10/21/2002 +1300, Joop Teernstra wrote:
Also the webmastering *and* webserver hosting are now again in one hand, 
which is a worry for those who care about checks and balances.

> Let me enumerate the The Rules, under which a volunteer would be willing 
> to serve as your successor :
>
> 1. the webmaster  will have the support of at least 7 of the 11 Panel members.
  Bret was elected by a vote of 6-1-1.  That is a strong endorsement.

> 2. the webmaster will keep himself accountable to the membership by 
> publishing in the Forum a monthly log of all changes made  and of the time 
> spent on the changes.
  this seems like a good idea

> 3. the webmaster will request approval for changes from the Panel, in non 
> -controversial cases after and in controversial cases *before* 
> implementing them.
  this seems like a good idea

> 4. the webmaster will stand for a vote-of-confidence (by Panel , 
> confirmed  by the members) after  6 months.
  this seems reasonable

> 5. the webmaster will hand over control of the server to a Panel member 
> who is elected by the Panel specifically for this role.
  I would rephrase this: webmastering and webserver hosting should be in 
different hands



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de