[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[atlarge-discuss] Re: Was Shanghai set up as a distraction ?
- To: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@ameritech.net>
- Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Re: Was Shanghai set up as a distraction ?
- From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:37:21 -0400
- Cc: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>, steinle@smartvia.de, yjpark@myepark.com, andy@ccc.de, "@quasar Internet Solutions, Inc." <shore@quasar.net>, Bruce Young <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>, eric@hi-tek.com, jefsey@jefsey.com, Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>, Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com>, Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>, Judith Oppenheimer <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>, k@widgital.com, karl@cavebear.com, love@cptech.org, ray@fassett.org, Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>, "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@vrx.net>, discuss <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-to: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-list: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: Hermes Network, Inc.
- References: <031b01c27aa9$a215baf0$0100a8c0@repligate>
Jim Fleming wrote:
> http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-discuss/0210/msg00869.html
> From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
> Shanghai meeting broadcast?
> ====
>
> Was Shanghai set up as a distraction ?
> http://register.icann.org/cgi/attendees.cgi
An interesting question... I wonder just how technical the majority of the people
attending Shanghai will be?
>
> ======================================
>
> While ARIN works out the deals...
> http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0210/index.html
> http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0210/attendee.list.html
This looks more like a technical coordination body as opposed to a lawyer and public
relations fest...
Hmm, Jim, I think you may have a point.
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
>
> And 0:201 .COM moves forward....finally free of .ORG[Y]...and those so-called ccTLDs...
> http://www.domainnameconference.com
>
> Jim Fleming
> 128-bit DNS is closer than you think...
> 0:201 .COM
> http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
> http://ipv8.dyns.cx
> http://ipv8.no-ip.com
> http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
> http://ipv8.no-ip.info
> http://ipv8.myip.us
> http://ipv8.dyn.ee
> http://ipv8.community.net.au
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de