[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] ERC vs At-Large Representation

To: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>, <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ERC vs At-Large Representation
From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:57:15 -0000
Delivered-to: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
List-help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
List-post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
List-subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
Mailing-list: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
References: <000f01c27fef$10641160$e24c16d2@yj>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: YJ Park <yjpark@myepark.com>

> Alejandro expressed that the Board doesn't want to revisit 9 Board
> of Directors.

Well that's pretty pathetic then, isn't it?

The word Fascist springs to mind.

Wholly, wholly unacceptable.

Richard Henderson


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [atlarge-discuss] ERC vs At-Large Representation
  - From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>

References:
- [atlarge-discuss] ERC vs At-Large Representation
  - From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ICANNATLARGE.ORG still not resloving - Day 4 and counting...
Next by Date: Re: [atlarge-discuss] PASSED: ALAC/ALOC REPRESENTATIVES
Previous by thread: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ERC vs At-Large Representation
Next by thread: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ERC vs At-Large Representation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread