At 02:30 a.m. 16/01/2003, Walter Schmidt wrote:
Let's say we wanted to politically represent the USA. There is no way in heck that we would attempt to do so with just ONE political party.
Right on!
Now, we are suggesting we will represent all (of the world's) atlarge internet users - and in doing so we are trying to PICK ONE POINT OF VIEW and we seem to expect that to work. NO WAY!!!! As example - there will those of us who believe we should join ICANN's ALSO through the RALOs, and there will be those of us who believe we should stay totally outside as a pressure group etc. WE MUST ACCOMMODATE ALL POINTS OF VIEW, or in reality we will never represent the ATLARGE.
I have confidence that we are on the same wavelength here.
The bylaws can be all inclusive if they contain clauses like:So what do we do - we develop a mission statement that is all inclusive - and we've done that already several times over - we write bylaws to be all inclusive - and we move forward.