[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] To RALO or not to RALO
- To: DannyYounger@cs.com
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] To RALO or not to RALO
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 02:45:01 -0800
- Cc: richardhenderson@ntlworld.com, sherwood@islands.vi, walts@dorsai.org, david@farrar.com, bruce@barelyadequate.info, emv@southtech.com.ar, hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu, james.love@cptech.org, jefsey@club-internet.fr, mgeist@uottawa.ca, icheckemail@indiatimes.com, vb@vitaminic.net, vivek@vivekdurai.com, yjpark@myepark.com, atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-to: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-list: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <16c.193ff963.2b57aba1@cs.com>
Danny and all,
Sad as is is, Danny is quite right here... I hope some folks here
are really listening or paying attention...
Nicely and aptly put here Danny. Well done!
DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> Richard writes: << But the question: "To RALO or not to RALO" cannot be
> avoided. >>
>
> I disagree. The question can readily be avoided. Icannatlarge.org will
> never be part of the RALO process because it will never meet the anticipated
> certification requirements for a RALO "structure":
>
> 1. It is not regional organization
> 2. It is not even an organization -- no bylaws nor charter, no
> incorporation, etc.
>
> Further, as per the preliminary recommendations of the ALAC-AG for acceptable
> at-large structures, you will note that icannatlarge is not:
>
> a. self-sufficient
> b. able to post current information about the organization's aims,
> structure, constituents, and working mechanisms
> c. able to guarantee and demonstrate the real identities of its constituents
>
> There is only one way that icannatlarge can fit into the proposed reform
> model in conjunction with the RALOs... the ICANN Bylaws specify that the ALAC
> must offer "Internet-based mechanisms that enable discussions among members
> of At-Large structures" -- in other words, an open and transparent discussion
> list. That's all that icannatlarge is anyway. When the time comes, everyone
> will migrate to the new ALAC discussion list, and icannatlarge as an
> organization will effectively cease to exist (unless it adopts some other
> narrowly defined mission such as, for example, the overthrow and replacement
> of ICANN).
>
> Either stake out a narrow defining mission for this group that most
> participants can rally behind or accept the inevitable dissolution of this
> body. I see no other alternatives.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de