[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Constituency
DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> My proposal is fairly straight-forward: Let us petition the Board for
> recognition as a new Constituency. I am willing to devote time and energy to
> a collaborative attempt to prepare such a petition (which I presume would be
> accompanied by a Charter for such a constituency). In my estimation, both
> the Charter and the petition could be available for presentation to the Board
> at the upcoming meeting if we throw ourselves wholeheartedly into this
> endeavor. Let me know your thoughts...
Danny,
1) Does this mean you're now a member of icannatlarge?
2) I fully support this initiative (even though it's chances of succeeding are
slim to none IMHO) and I offer my help in drafting the petition.
If they refuse such a petition, provided we have a good number of signees, then
it will be one more indication that ICANN is not about Internet Community
interests as a whole. But rather, that ICANN ignores the public atlarge and
caters to special interests such as the Intellectual Property lobby and Business.
Sincerely,
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de