Re: [atlarge-discuss] Bylaw Corrections:

[Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com>]

Just curious - why dont you people appoint an @large to the inclusive
namespace community.  At least we pay attention.  And you can work on
getting your icann standing in a few years.  Or as I predict - never.  In
a few years icann will be gone.

as it should be

regards
joe baptista

Joe Baptista - only at www.baptista.god

   Benison International customer center http://www.Benison.SoCal

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Jan Siren wrote:

> These corrections do not address the principal defect of the Bylaws, which is that
> at-large individual users are not provided a direct means of electing representatives
> to the Board.  The proposed Regional At-Large Organizations (RALOs) structure, based
> upon regions defined by the original ICANN charter (but with no other a priori
> raisons d'etre), assumes the existence of robust and stable organizations; organizations
> which are unlikely ever to come into existence, however.  In any event, such RALOs
> will be years in the making at best, but the need, and demand, for At-large user
> representation is immediate.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de