[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [atlarge-discuss] Panel Mandate options



Joop Teernstra wrote:

| There has been no discussion and therefore I'll try a quick 
| straw poll.

See my annotations below

Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!



| -----Original Message-----
| From: Joop Teernstra [mailto:terastra@terabytz.co.nz]
| Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 4:00 PM
| To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
| Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Panel Mandate options
| 
| 
| Before I could second any Nomination, I need to know what 
| Mandate this new 
| Panel will get.
| 
| There has been no discussion and therefore I'll try a quick 
| straw poll.
| 
| [ ] Panel of eleven mandated to oversee the website only 
| (narrow mandate)
| 
| [ ] Panel of 5 mandated to oversee the website only (narrow mandate)
| 
| [ X ] Panel of 11 mandated to oversee the website and all use 
| of the members' list.
| 
| [ ] I want a separate membership committee to oversee all use of the 
| members' list.
| 
| [ ] Panel of eleven with mandate to oversee website, members' 
| list and Polling (wide mandate)
| 
| [ X ] I want a separate elected Polling Commission to oversee Polling
| 
| 
| Please give more options if you think they are needed.
| Please give some arguments for or against the different options.
| 
| This list can give its opinion in a straw Poll, but it does 
| not speak for 
| the wider membership.
| 
| I would therefore ask for your support in order to Poll the whole 
| membership via the Polling Booth.
| 
| 
| -joop-


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de