[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] Panel Motion Passed! On to Elections! BULL HOCKEY




Jeff Williams schrieb:
> 
> Holger and all fellow members,
> 
> Holger Steiner wrote:
> 
> > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > >
> > > Holger and all fellow members,
> > >
> > > Holger Steiner wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruce and all fellow members,
> > > > >
> > > > > bruce@barelyadequate.info wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Jeff Williams wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > |    Hogwash!  Vittorio and Judyth knew exactly what they were doing
> > > > > > |  when Vittorio FTP'ed the Membership list to Judyth.  FTP is a
> > > > > > |  one way file transfer.  You have to have an FTP client up an running
> > > > > > |  on you PC for it to receive or send.  So I am not buying into this
> > > > > > |  hogwash at all.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think you misunderstood her.  Vittorio e-mailed the lists to her, along
> > > > > > with the FTP access codes for the Web site.  Judyth says they showed up in
> > > > > > her inbox without her prior knowledge, and I believe her.
> > > > >
> > > > >   No that is not what I was referring to Bruce. You edited out my full
> > > > > post.  So again you are the one not understanding.  Read again what
> > > > > I said IN FULL.  I was talking about Judyth sending FTP the membership
> > > > > list to you, eric and Jefsey, and than before hand Vittorio sending the
> > > > > FTP codes and Judyth downloading via FTP the membership list from
> > > > > Vittorio was a wanton act as FTP as a protocol required that as it is a
> > > > > one way file transfer protocol facility, ect..
> > > >
> > > > You did not read the e-mails in the archives, as I said to you?
> > >
> > >   This sentence doesn't parse and also is not constructed properly
> > > Holger.  So I have not good idea as to what you are trying to ask here.
> >
> > I do think you get the meaning.
> 
>   Sorry, but no I don't.  Hence why I stated the above in my previous
> post on this thread.

Then I am sorry for you.

 
> > > > > However in any event when some time ago now that Vittorio sent
> > > > > Judyth and Jan the FTP codes, again Judyth HAD to initiate the
> > > > > action, and she did.  When she did she took on a responsibility that
> > > > > she later pledged and oath to protect.  She has now broken that oath,
> > > > > making her oath worthless, and any subsequent oath VERY circumspect!
> > > >
> > > > Obviously you are making things up as you go.
> > >
> > >   Oh, prove it!  No Holger I am not.  But you seem to obviously
> > > not reading ALL of the archives.
> >
> > Proof?
> >
> > Like the proof you always throw around?
> 
>   Throw around?  Unless I am terribly mistaken throwing
> anything around on E-Mail is not possible.

Wow. Does anybody else write these witty answers for you or are
they just your genius at work?


>  However I do
> not need to provide what is available for anyone to find for
> themselves.

You have obviously lost the thread.
Read it again to pick it up.

I am sorry for you.


>  However if you wish to insist, please do
> so properly in  a court of law.  I would be more than happy
> to do so for such a court of proper jurisdiction anytime.  >;)

LOL.
In german we would call somebody like you a "Prozesshansel".
Sorry, I cant translate that.


> However as far as I know, this forum is not such a court.
> If it were perhaps you would make a perfect court jester!  >;)

You have lost it again.

 
> > Look into the archives to get the proof.
> 
>   I already did, and quoted from them on this very thread...
> Perhaps paying closer attention would be a good idea for
> you to consider.

No, you did not.
Look it up in the archives.

 
> > > > Please have a read in the archives...
> > >
> > >   I do ever other day.  I Grep them into my database two or three
> > > times a week as well.  But it is clear that you "Selectively" read
> > > the archives or don't read them at all.  Please do so IN FULL!  >;)
> >
> > Talking to a mirror or to the 129.000 Members in your head again?
> 
>   No that would be far to difficult for me to accomplish.  These posts
> do go to all of the INEGroup members though... But of course I have
> told you that several times now.

Yes, I remember that joke from somewhere else.

 
> > You are slinging around false accusations and you know it.
> > Dont try to weasel your way out.
> 
>   No I am not.

Yes, you do.


>  And I think you know that.

Yes, I do.


>  In fact I think you are
> attempting to spin again by casting false aspirations.  Of course
> you have a long reputation of that sort of activity...

>From where do you know this "long reputation"?


>  But maybe
> it is just that your limited understanding of english is where your
> problem begins, given several of you improperly constructed
> sentences and the question on this very thread and previous post
> of yours, that seems a good possibility as well...

That could be the case.
Funny thing is, you seem to have the same problem.

 
>   The only remaining idea I have or can surmise from your
> lack of accuracy in your statement above is that you are
> not mentally stable or suffering from memory depravation.
> As I don't know what you age is, that could be a condition
> known as dementia...

No, Irony is still no metal...

Your to good to be true.



amused greetings
Holger 

-- 
######################################
Holger Steiner
Programmer & Consultant
Synchron GmbH
h.steiner@synchron-is.de
http://www.synchron-is.de
<script>alert("Only the code gets executed, not the
intentions...")</script>
######################################

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de