On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 23:20, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote: > > Stephen Waters wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 19:43, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote: > > > > > espresso@e-scape.net wrote: > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > Perhaps this will help to explain why I respectfully > > > > disagree with my fellow-Canadian, Sotiris, who seems > > > > to believe only those willing to pay $100 to have their > > > > identity notarized should be eligible to join a group > > > > protesting the lack of democracy and openness within > > > > ICANN. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Poppycock! I stated no such thing. > > > > > > > Then, I think there was a misunderstanding about what you meant in these > > messages. > > > > http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-discuss/0304/msg00309.html > > http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-discuss/0304/msg00463.html > 1) The "misunderstanding" is Judyth's and obviously arises from her > spin on my original position... The Thawte WoT is free to most people > internationally, there is no cost (or very very little) if you use the > WoT notaries. > > 2) I already stated that the PayPal alternative is another acceptable > means of verification, so Judyth's statement is false in that she > neglects (purposefully?) to mention that I am open to alternative > schemas. I guess I was focusing in on "have their identity notarized", i.e., people who needed to keep their identity secret because of their country of origin... not so much on the dollar value. -s
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part