[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] response to the question of a nominee




Jan Siren schrieb:
> 
[snip]
> At this point, I must respectfully disagree.  Every organization I have
> ever belonged to that professed even a semblance of democratic process,
> required *public* nominations and seconds.  The only secret part of the
> process was the balloting itself, allowing the voters to express their
> true preferences without fear of personal recrimination.  I don't believe
> democracy is served by departing from this model.

I have to agree.

Secret nominations and seconds is somewhat, err, surprising?

There should be one, and only one, channel for nominations. This list.


greetings
Holger

-- 
######################################
Holger Steiner
Programmer & Consultant
Synchron GmbH
h.steiner@synchron-is.de
http://www.synchron-is.de
<script>alert("Only the code gets executed, not the
intentions...")</script>
######################################

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de