Jan Siren schrieb:
[snip]
At this point, I must respectfully disagree. Every organization I have
ever belonged to that professed even a semblance of democratic process,
required *public* nominations and seconds. The only secret part of the
process was the balloting itself, allowing the voters to express their
true preferences without fear of personal recrimination. I don't believe
democracy is served by departing from this model.
I have to agree.
Secret nominations and seconds is somewhat, err, surprising?
There should be one, and only one, channel for nominations. This list.
Agreed. Public, onlist nominations and seconds only are acceptable.