[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] The issue of non-voting panelists



On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Richard Henderson wrote:

> I suggest that any panelist who fails to vote in three consecutive votes
> (or in 75% of all votes) should face a vote of confidence from the whole
> Membership.

   ...or, perhaps,  a vote of confidence from the Panel?

A local Chamber of Commerce felt so strongly about participation this is
in their By-Laws:

Section 9. Automatic Removal - Absence by a member of the Board from three
(3) consecutive regular meetings of the Board and/or of the Chamber
without deemed valid excuse and so recorded by the Board, shall be
construed as a resignation from office.

Works for them - and yes, it has been "used."

--

 ---  REgards, walts@dorsai.org  Walter C. Schmidt, IT CPA  Blue(^) ---
 - -   Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Media Center Edition - HPMC 873n  ---
 - -                 Associate Expert - Expert Zone                 - -
 ---         http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/         ---
 - - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/columns/schmidt/ ---
 - - 52 Ken           http://www.dorsai.org/~walts/          Sun 57 - -


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de