[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Provisional Membership Committee
Sotiris and all fellow members,
Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> >Hugh, Sotiris and all fellow members,
> >
> >Hugh Blair wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: Jeff Williams
> >>>Hugh, Sotiris and all fellow members,
> >>>
> >>> What does "Pending"actually mean?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>How the ^&*( would I know? Sotiris is doing his
> >>own thing and I guess it means that he knows who
> >>*he* is but doesn't know who *you* are.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I think Sotiris does know whom am as we have chatted
> >on the phone on a couple of occasions. And I was asking
> >BOTH you and Sotiris this question, not just you, hence
> >why I opened my response with "Hugh, Sotiris, and all fellow members"
>
> >Abel. Perhaps you do not understand what such denotes?
> >
>
> Someone claiming to be Jeff Williams has called my residence in the
> past
> (on several occasions).
No you called me twice. The first call according to the phone
companies log was a conference call with yourself, myself, Eric,
Roeland Mayer, Jim Flemming, and Jefsey which Eric placed from his than
office
with Hi-Tek.com
> This is no proof of anything aside from the
> fact that I received a telephone call from someone claiming to be
> "Jeff
> Williams".
You acknowledged me by name, eric by name, Jefsey by name, and
Roeland by name. I have the full recording on file BTW...
Also see attached file containing a number of E-Mail posts that the
person named Sotiris addressed me by name below.
I am sorry that this has become necessary Sotiris but you seemed
to be begging the need.
>
>
> Hope that speaks to your concerns.
>
> --Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
>
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
Subject:
Re: [wg-review] Boycott and a New Beginning
Date:
Sun, 03 Jun 2001 06:01:56 -0400
From:
Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To:
Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
CC:
Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>, Sotiris <mnemotechny@yahoo.ca>, lee@hi-tek.com,
Thomas Johnson <thomas@hi-tek.com>, Sheldon Silverman <ssilverm@san.rr.com>,
Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
References:
1 , 2 , 3
ed the withdrawal of the ccTLDs from ICANN, it shows that
> > our independent moves here have reached a prescient moment and that our
> > synergistic effect is unstoppable. Gentlemen this is larger than us but we will
> > not be given more than we can handle if we work together.
> >
> > Jefsey your experience in Timor is what we need to understand what we can do
> > right and what we can do wrong, we are talking of shoeshine boys and peasant
> > girls here and we must do well. Everything you mention here is doable and
> > fundable. Our psychic visionary Lee has many times given me a glimple of his
> > "knowledge" of this scenario.
> >
> > Tom we need your expertise in coordinating the marketing for world wide
> > enthusiasm, you know how to reach fortune 500 ceo's and shopkeepers in India.
> >
> > Sheldon business plans are a must here get those world wide businessmen thinking
> > of this new convergence.
> >
> > Sotiris we need hard long term philosophical advise here in order to avoid
> > pitfalls, we need your thoughts.
> >
> > Jeff the political scene appears to want us to take the ball and run with it -
> > how far and fast can we go.
> >
> > Lee can this technically be accomplished? What do we need to make it work?
> >
> > I will leave introductions for later I am thinking 10 am on tuesday morning
> > California time for a telephone conference.
> >
> > I recognize that I am in the presence of men who are so far out of my league
> > that I cannot buy a ticket to watch but what the heck you need one normal guy in
> > here.
> >
> > God help us, here we go!
> >
> > eric
> >
> > Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> >
> > > Ladies, Gentlemen,
> > > This is a very important mail. I cannot measure yet the whole impact it
> > > may have and I will propose to stick to the practical issues you raise: not
> > > against or for the iCANN, just independently.
> > >
> > > First my response is as Chair of the tiny world@wide foundation (
> > > http://world@wide.org ) a small thing by a very few to serve who we can,
> > > but which may develop a lot in the coming weeks. To help in practical ways
> > > and particularly with our "Digital Continuity" projects against the Digital
> > > Divide": to help small ones to technically equal larges ones.
> > >
> > > Two, I certainly want to welcome and support any effort for the people of
> > > Vietnam (as I tried doing with East Timor). Vietnamese a really dear to our
> > > harts. We can certainly have people in here selling ".vn" on French
> > > resellers sites. I meet one on Tuesday next, this can be organized.
> > >
> > > Three. The urgency for small TLDs is a TLD-Management tool. From site
> > > organization, registration collection, administration and payments, ML
> > > management, polling of the users, WHOIS, outreach and market knowledge, DNS
> > > se-up and testing, DNS system documentation, etc... Many share that need.
> > > Many of us have some experience and some building blocks. My plan is to
> > > have a foundation coordinating the specifications, the proposed building
> > > blocks, and development costs (could be a GNU project), my greatest hope is
> > > that we could join forces.
> > >
> > > Four. There is need for a secondary server network to be set-up and
> > > organized. We name that plan the "Bind Ring": to progressively invest in
> > > stable sites with 64bits machines offering DNS services using a Bind 9.1.2
> > > or the like with added DNS features allowing new DNS services for
> > > international and local development. We have a business plan for it to both
> > > pay it back and develop local competence, in having 24/365 e-mail support
> > > services in different languages by teams round the world. I made that to
> > > work back in the early 80s. No big deal.
> > >
> > > Five. There is a need for international information on developing countries
> > > and a local Internet. I have a private project for a large deployment of
> > > local hubs to that end. This area is therefore of business concern to me. I
> > > wish to share with others on that matters. In particular we would like to
> > > develop an e-commercial service for the third world countries where their
> > > products could be proposed in a clear, systematic top quality way on fast
> > > machines with nice and fast pictures (AKAMAI) while maintained home on
> > > simple data bases and linked with an adapted robust and simple EDI/e-mail
> > > system to the commercial partners or state export offices. Same for tourism.
> > >
> > > If we could share into this, I think you would have made a great day.
> > > Forget about Stockholm.
> > >
> > > Jefsey
> > >
> > > At 07:37 31/05/01, Eric Dierker wrote:
> > > >Friends, I regret to inform you that I am not attending the meeting in
> > > >Stockholm.
> > > >After a marathon emergency board meeting today our company
> > > >http://www.hi-tek.com/ decided that we must show our solidarity with the
> > > >many who in recent days have been so negatively
> > > >impacted by the ICANN board of Directors actions. This decision was not
> > > >easy, but right
> > > >choices are often the most difficult. A second decision was to move up
> > > >our time table and launch our pre-registration of the long awaited and
> > > >highly coveted
> > > >dotVN. We in conjunction with our Vietnamese friends feel it is our
> > > >obligation to launch this at this time to help and preserve the
> > > >independence of the Internet as a whole.
> > > >Hi-Tek working with the Vietnamese people will endeavor with our every
> > > >fiber to preserve the rights of Countries and Individual Internet users
> > > >everywhere. We
> > > >are opposed to the Warehousing and Monopolistic policies currently being
> > > >
> > > >supported and endorsed by the ICANN Staff and Board of Directors. We are
> > > >in complete support of the righteous and correct "coolroots" and want to
> > > >help establish more - one for each country, we support Mr. Flemming's
> > > >new design for connectivity. We will market the Country and most
> > > >importantly the wonderful people of Vietnam using their priceless
> > > >ccTLD. And we stand ready to assist other Countries do to the same. The
> > > >best defense against tyranny is to build viable alternatives, and we
> > > >believe each independent country is that alternative.
> > > >
> > > >This is a good model for freetrade and freeinformation and freepeoples.
> > > >Independence, Freedom and Happiness is Vietnams' slogan and they are
> > > >working painfully hard to realize that truth. We are a company of
> > > >Vietnamese-Americans with a history of freedom fighting, independence
> > > >and great happiness.
> > > >
> > > >Inasmuch we extend an olive branch and desire to help, financially,
> > > >legally and morally Ms. Leah Gallegos and her battle weary dotBIZ, and
> > > >we promise not to go quietly, and we ask others to join us. We support
> > > >the concept of the TLDA, although we withhold judgment on it's
> > > >implementation, as we all should have ICANN's. We are in agreement with
> > > >the founding concepts of dotDE, dotUK and dotFR as they were
> > > >implemented, we only ask them to open dialogue with us to discuss ways
> > > >in which ccTLDs can move forward in our ever changing world. At his
> > > >time we find no disagreement with the GAC and hope to work with them to
> > > >fulfill both of our missions. We are opposed to the previously
> > > >commercialized ccTLDs as we believe those should only be commercialized
> > > >in concordance with the best interests of the countries they represent.
> > > >Warehousing without value added pure speculation is bad for the
> > > >internet.
> > > >
> > > >Our UDRP will be in accordance with existing and pending bilateral and
> > > >WTO trade agreements and stringently compliant with TRIPS but not offer
> > > >the further encroachment allowed and endorsed by WIPO. It will be
> > > >easily enforced with a 90 day "use it or lose it policy" which will
> > > >further enhance the driving force of competition and usage of the
> > > >internet and discourage warehousing. We are currently negotiating with
> > > >WIPO accredited mediators to jump ship and work in a more fair system.
> > > >
> > > >We intend to extend a request for proposal from Mr. Morfin to help form
> > > >a ccTLD union outside of ICANN and supportive of the above principles.
> > > >We hereby ask for competitive RFPs. Which further honors and respects
> > > >both small business's and individual users of the Internet both with and
> > > >without domain names. We honor and desire to ensure viability for the
> > > >most important driving force in the world today, start-up entrepeneurs.
> > > >
> > > >Outreach. Our outreach includes placing ten percent of our income into
> > > >the building and maintenance of educational facilities for ESL and
> > > >Technology as a Second Language and quick "feed your family"
> > > >certification alliances with Microsoft, Cisco, Gateway, Sun and many
> > > >more still in negotiations for emerging countries. Another ten percent
> > > >is earmarked for direct financial investment into information technology
> > > >jobs for the hungry, and unemployed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Please provide your thoughts we are open and transparent for real.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >As always,
> > > >Sincerely,
> > > >Eric Dierker
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----------------------------
> > > >
> > > >To unsubscribe from this group, send a blank email to:
> > > >
> > > >wg-review-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > > -----------------------------
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send a blank email to:
> > >
> > > wg-review-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
============== Next Sotiris post starts here ========================
Subject:
Re: Private
Date:
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 01:24:01 -0800
From:
Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To:
Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
CC:
Eric Dierker <Eric@hi-tek.com>,
Dan Steinberg <synthesis@videotron.ca>
References:
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17
This is most certainly the most outrageous thing I've ever heard!
Sotiris
Jeff Williams wrote:
> Eric and all assembly members,
>
> Oh so now Sotiris is Ivan Solomon?! Did read that right (See
below
> in Erics comments). What's next, your Melvin Beli that had his
name
> changed under court seal in this case to Eric Dierker? Please
advise.
>
> P.S. I can see why you wanted to keep this response off-list...
>
> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Yes Jeff there is a credibility problem here.
> >
> > The only credible "thing" that SS has produced is a reference to
my
> > representation through a Qui Tam action where in I was lead
attorney
> > working with the Secret Service, FBI, and IRS. Mr. Sotiris'
friend was
> > the snitch and porno seller who worked for the drug and porn
money
> > launderers. He lost his personal case but the Gov. won theirs,
to the
> > tune of millions. It took me a few hours to check but why don't
you
> > look up Ivan Solomon as plaintiff in US District court, the
records are
> > now unsealed. Although I ended up being disabled with illness I
had to
> > leave for Mexico and move my family. Sotiris is not only being
an idiot
> > listening to a child porn selling freak he is possibly
endangering his
> > and my life. In fact why don't you
> > look up why SS lives in Canada and ask him if he did not used to
be
> > known as Ivan Solomon.
> >
> > Best too you brother. Read the article he wisely sent you
privately
> > read it carefully and see if my cover has not been blown. Now
who is
> > going to believe I went crazy and am no threat.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > Jeff Williams wrote:
> >
> > > Dan and all assembly members,
> > >
> > > Normally I would agree with you on this Dan. But in this
instance
> > > there is a seeming creditability concern that should be flushed
out
> > > openly.
> > >
> > > Dan Steinberg wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would echo this sentiment. Surely there are better things
to do on Sotiris.time than attack people?
> > > >
> > > > DPF wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:20:08 -0800, Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> > > > > <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Eric Dierker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Sotiris,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This is entirely false and any and all records will show
that I resigned due to disability which
> > > > > >> ultimately resulted years later in six months of
chemotherapy and later total remission. You
> > > > > >> know what is funny about this attack is that in later
years it has been determined that the
> > > > > >> non-hodgkins stage four lymphoma with pancreatic
involvement that I was diagnosed with was
> > > > > >> determined to be caused by Atomic fallout in Northern
Arizona.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Really? Well, I've read that cocaine has been proven to
be
> > > > > >a cause of non-Hodgkins lymphoma:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am sure I am not the only person finding this unedifying
to say the
> > > > > least. Mr Dierker is not at this point in time standing
for any
> > > > > office so what is gained from this?
> > > > >
> > > > > I take no position on the validity or otherwise of the
claims but I
> > > > > would like to say I feel the topic matter is inappropriate
for this
> > > > > list as it in no way relates to ICANN or DNSO matters.
> > > > >
> > > > > DPF
> > > > > --
> > > > > david@farrar.com
> > > > > ICQ 29964527
> > > > > --
> > > > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dan Steinberg
> > > >
> > > > SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> > > > 35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
> > > > Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
> > > > J9B 1N1 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes
strong!)
> > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > > Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
=============Third post to me from Sotiris follows ==========
Subject:
Re: Private Response to: Re: [ga] New Privacy Initiative
Date:
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:57:43 -0400
From:
"Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To:
"Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
References:
1 , 2 , 3
Jeff, you can call me tomorrow afternoon, around 1:00pm EST at
416-422-1034
Look forward to hearing from you.
Sotiris.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
To: Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 4:21 PM
Subject: Private Response to: Re: [ga] New Privacy Initiative
> Sotiris.
>
> Thank you for the link/url. I would like to talk to you on the
phone
> about these an other issues. Do you have a contact number?
>
> Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
> > Here you are Roeland:
> > http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-5070401.html
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
> > To: 'Joe Gluza' <jlg1@cam.ac.uk>; Joop Teernstra
<terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
> > Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 12:23 PM
> > Subject: RE: [ga] New Privacy Initiative
> >
> > > > From: Joe Gluza [mailto:jlg1@cam.ac.uk]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 4:20 AM
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > > >
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > Especially for Individual Domain Name Holders privacy of
their
home
> > > > > adresses and protection against abuse of their email
> > > > adresses is a crucial
> > > > > issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > At this point in time, only EU citizens enjoy such
protection.
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > But probably not for much longer. The story is that the US
> > > > is about to use the
> > > > WTO to overturn EU privacy laws concerning Data Security
> > > > which are thought to
> > > > constrain US business.
> > >
> > > Can you provide URL for this?
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
========Forth verification by my name from Sotiris follows====
Subject:
Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
Date:
Sat, 19 May 2001 13:37:29 -0400
From:
Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To:
Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
References:
1 , 2 , 3
Thanks Jeff.
I understand you called me this morning. My apologies, but I was up
well into the
wee hours of the morning and didn't get to bed until very late. This
is a holiday
weekend up here in Canada (Monday is Victoria Day), I was invited to
a few get
togethers and events so I'm going to be quite busy. Can it wait till
Tuesday?
Sincerely,
Sotiris
Jeff Williams wrote:
> Sotiris and all assembly members,
>
> I prefer your wording Sotiris. Well done!
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
> > "babybows.com" wrote:
> >
> > > The motion put forward by Joop Teernstra has been worded as a
ballot:
> > >
> > > The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its
support for the
> > > immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency by
the ICANN Board
> > > in accordance with its Bylaws.
> >
> > I'm not crazy about the "immediate acknowledgement" part, seems
too aggressive.
> > Simply "acknowledgement" should suffice.
> >
> > > The General Assembly of the DNSO recommends
> > > to the ICANN Board that it place either the creation of such an
Individuals'
> > > Constituency or the "approval in principle" on its agenda for a
decision at
> > > the Stockholm plenary session.
> >
> > This could be the entire motion in itself, given a slight
rewording:
> >
> > The General Assembly of the DNSO recommends
> > to the ICANN Board that it place either the creation of an
Individuals'
> > Constituency or the "approval in principle" of such a
constituency, on its
> > agenda for a decision at
> > the Stockholm plenary session.
> >
> > My 2 cents on the matter.
> >
> > Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
=========Fifth E-Mail to which Sotiris identifies me by name =====
Subject:
Re: [Fwd: Higher domain name prices may be on the way]
Date:
Thu, 19 Apr 2001 01:10:25 -0400
From:
Sotiris <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To:
Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
References:
1
Thanks Jeff! This is definitely of interest.
Sincerely,
Sotiris
Jeff Williams wrote:
> Eric and Sotiris,
>
> This might be of interest to you. It sure is to me... I got this
from
> the NCDNHC
> ML. Please read carefully...
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Higher domain name prices may be on the way
> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:35:38 -0400
> From: Chris Chiu <CCHIU@aclu.org>
> To: "Ncdnhc-Discuss@Lyris. Isoc. Org (E-mail)"
> <ncdnhc-discuss@lyris.isoc.org>
>
> ICANN is looking to raise registrar application fees to US $2500,
and to
> charge registrar accreditation fees of $4000 for the first
Top-Level Domain
> plus $500 for each additional TLD. It is unclear just how much of
these
> costs will be passed on to individual end-users, or what impact
these price
> hikes may have on developing countries.
>
> See
> http://www.internetdemocracyproject.org/#highlights
>
> Sincerely,
> Christopher Chiu
> Global Internet Liberty Campaign Organizer
> American Civil Liberties Union
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as:
Jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1799I@lyris.isoc.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de