RE: [atlarge-discuss] Posting point...

["Hugh Blair" <hblair@hotfootmail.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Holt
> 
> The items mentioned are digital signatures used for identity
> verification.  Hugh, if you are so adamantly opposed to using better
> software and personal identification, that is of course your problem.
> It will continue to be more and more acceptable and perhaps even
> preferable for emails to have such verifications.

For the record, I am not "so adamantly opposed to using better"
anything. I just happen to have a major problem with my main computer.
The Win2k OS has almost bought the farm and until I get some extra
time and money, it's going to stay in a barely-working mode. I usually
use Outlook XP as my email client, but the OS is so FUBARd that it
won't read some types of emails - digitally signed ones are among that
group. 

Now if you want to find me a spare 2 days, and buy me a fresh HD...

I'm not advocating that anyone not use what they want. I just wanted
to point out that not everyone is able to read those words of wisdom.

Onward...  :>)

Hugh


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de