Re: [atlarge-discuss] 11 Member Panel

[Jan Siren <sirenj@earthlink.net>]

Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> 
> With respect to the 11 member panel.  In the event that one or more of
> the elected Panelists proves to be unverifiable, I think it's best the
> Panel be reduced in size rather than have any replacements promoted from
> the candidates who did not make the top 11.
> 

I respectfully disagree.  I think it is important to start out, at least, 
with a fully-populated 11-member Panel, even if that means dipping into the 
"followers" at the outset.  I think any judge would find the distinction 
between unverifiable elected Panelists, and Panelists who nullified 
themselves through inaction later, as trivial; the same procedure for 
replacement should apply in either case.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de