Re: [atlarge-discuss] 11 Member Panel

["Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>]

I concur with Jan's response to this issue.

Ron Sherwood

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Siren" <sirenj@earthlink.net>
To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] 11 Member Panel


> Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> >
> > With respect to the 11 member panel.  In the event that one or more of
> > the elected Panelists proves to be unverifiable, I think it's best the
> > Panel be reduced in size rather than have any replacements promoted from
> > the candidates who did not make the top 11.
> >
>
> I respectfully disagree.  I think it is important to start out, at least,
> with a fully-populated 11-member Panel, even if that means dipping into
the
> "followers" at the outset.  I think any judge would find the distinction
> between unverifiable elected Panelists, and Panelists who nullified
> themselves through inaction later, as trivial; the same procedure for
> replacement should apply in either case.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de