Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC

["Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>]

Judith Oppenheimer has www.internetatlarge.org

I don't think the version with hyphens would be so helpful

----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Sherwood <sherwood@islands.vi>
To: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>; Hugh Blair
<hblair@hotfootmail.com>; 'At Large Discuss'
<atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC


> Internet-At-Large  (IAL)
>
> Ron Sherwood
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
> To: "Hugh Blair" <hblair@hotfootmail.com>; "'At Large Discuss'"
> <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC
>
>
> > I couldn't agree with you more, Hugh, if you are calling into question
the
> > prefix 'ICANN-' at the front of our name!
> >
> > This presupposes that ICANN is what Internet use and user organisation
is
> > all about.
> >
> > The dindling-to-non-existant interest in ALAC demonstrates what a
> deception
> > that viewpoint is.
> >
> > ZERO contributions on the ALAC list there.
> >
> > THOUSANDS of contributions each month here on this one.
> >
> > And MANY other user organisations all over the world, who no allegiance
to
> > this Californian quango, ICANN.
> >
> > I encourage our organisation to review yet again the proper and
> appropriate
> > name we should adopt, prior to any form of incorporation.
> >
> > We are an 'alternative ALAC'.
> >
> > We should structure globally as soon as possible, and mobilise, and
press
> on
> > to a formal status - so that we can be a magnet and beacon to all kinds
of
> > user groups and individuals, who care little or nothing for ICANN, but
do
> > care about their own freedoms to use the DNS, without interference from
> USG,
> > Big Business, IP constituency, or a handful of self-perpetuating
unknowns
> > who have installed themselves (with USG assistance) at ICANN.
> >
> > For goodness sake, break free from ICANN and its wretched name, and
begin
> > the real, alternative resistance!
> >
> > yrs,
> >
> > Richard Henderson
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Hugh Blair <hblair@hotfootmail.com>
> > To: 'At Large Discuss' <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 12:27 AM
> > Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> > >
> > > A telling reminder of the bottom up nature of the selection and
> > > organization process of the ICANN ALAC:
> >
>
http://forum.icann.org/mtg-cmts/alac-organization-comments/general/index.htm
> > l
> >
> > Seems like thousands and thousands of people really care...
> >
> > Remind me why this organization is called ICANNatlarge? Why are
> > we associating with that organization?
> >
> > Hugh
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de