Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC

["Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>]

Agreed

Ron

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
To: "Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>; "Hugh Blair"
<hblair@hotfootmail.com>; "'At Large Discuss'"
<atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC


> Judith Oppenheimer has www.internetatlarge.org
>
> I don't think the version with hyphens would be so helpful
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ron Sherwood <sherwood@islands.vi>
> To: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>; Hugh Blair
> <hblair@hotfootmail.com>; 'At Large Discuss'
> <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 1:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC
>
>
> > Internet-At-Large  (IAL)
> >
> > Ron Sherwood
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
> > To: "Hugh Blair" <hblair@hotfootmail.com>; "'At Large Discuss'"
> > <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 6:55 PM
> > Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC
> >
> >
> > > I couldn't agree with you more, Hugh, if you are calling into question
> the
> > > prefix 'ICANN-' at the front of our name!
> > >
> > > This presupposes that ICANN is what Internet use and user organisation
> is
> > > all about.
> > >
> > > The dindling-to-non-existant interest in ALAC demonstrates what a
> > deception
> > > that viewpoint is.
> > >
> > > ZERO contributions on the ALAC list there.
> > >
> > > THOUSANDS of contributions each month here on this one.
> > >
> > > And MANY other user organisations all over the world, who no
allegiance
> to
> > > this Californian quango, ICANN.
> > >
> > > I encourage our organisation to review yet again the proper and
> > appropriate
> > > name we should adopt, prior to any form of incorporation.
> > >
> > > We are an 'alternative ALAC'.
> > >
> > > We should structure globally as soon as possible, and mobilise, and
> press
> > on
> > > to a formal status - so that we can be a magnet and beacon to all
kinds
> of
> > > user groups and individuals, who care little or nothing for ICANN, but
> do
> > > care about their own freedoms to use the DNS, without interference
from
> > USG,
> > > Big Business, IP constituency, or a handful of self-perpetuating
> unknowns
> > > who have installed themselves (with USG assistance) at ICANN.
> > >
> > > For goodness sake, break free from ICANN and its wretched name, and
> begin
> > > the real, alternative resistance!
> > >
> > > yrs,
> > >
> > > Richard Henderson
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Hugh Blair <hblair@hotfootmail.com>
> > > To: 'At Large Discuss' <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 12:27 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> > > >
> > > > A telling reminder of the bottom up nature of the selection and
> > > > organization process of the ICANN ALAC:
> > >
> >
>
http://forum.icann.org/mtg-cmts/alac-organization-comments/general/index.htm
> > > l
> > >
> > > Seems like thousands and thousands of people really care...
> > >
> > > Remind me why this organization is called ICANNatlarge? Why are
> > > we associating with that organization?
> > >
> > > Hugh
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> > >
> >
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de