RE: [atlarge-discuss] The VOTE on the Polling Commission

["Jeff Holt" <jefftttt@txucom.net>]

Eric,

You misinterpreted my meaning.  There were no aspersions cast to the
South or any direction, rather toward the legalese that pervades much of
the documentation under which the world suffers.  As to the "normal" -
color has no bearing on the distinction but rather is dependent on
whether the citizen is in a position of supposed authority or just one
of "regular folks".

I could post bilingual messages easily, even multi-lingual, but see no
reason to do so since I believe it is better to let people make their
own translation errors and not confuse issues before they even have a
chance by including any less than accurate representation of my
thoughts. 

Sincerely,
 
Jeff Holt
Jefftttt@txucom.net
www.tejas-info-services.com
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Dierker [mailto:eric@hi-tek.com] 
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 5:43 PM
To: jefftttt@txucom.net
Cc: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] The VOTE on the Polling Commission

You see my friend it is the definition of a "normal citizen" that causes
the 
tensions. 
What color should a string be to be normal, white? rainbow? brown?
yellow? 
Black? red?  I suppose it depends on from where and when you came.
Comprehension in this area requires tolerance and cultural awareness.
Mauro has written most of his posts in dual linguistics - lest you can
do 
the same you should stop making aspersions against those south of your 
border although we all have our right of bias.
e

> Mauro, et al...
> 
 and how NOT to word things in a manner that
> makes then incomprehensible to the normal citizen.
> 
> Sincerely,
>  
> Jeff Holt
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de