[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FYI] Should Anonymity Be Illegal?

To: debate@fitug.de
Subject: Re: [FYI] Should Anonymity Be Illegal?
From: "Ralf Stephan" <ralf@ark.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 10:55:07 +0200
Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
In-Reply-To: <871z3ksnjl.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>; from Florian Weimer on Tue, May 02, 2000 at 10:30:06PM +0200
Mail-Followup-To: debate@fitug.de
References: <12mXMV-1w3lvEC@fmrl01.sul.t-online.de> <871z3ksnjl.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>
Reply-To: ralf@ark.in-berlin.de
Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de

Florian Weimer:
> Die Entwicklung von IPv6 ist schon recht weit
> fortgeschritten; es ist im wesentlichen einsatzbereit. 

Seit einem Jahr "deployed".


ralf
-- 
http://ME.IN-berlin.de/~rws/
No link accessible from this link should be construed as an endorsement of
these companies' products or services. These sites are not part of this
signature, and this signature has no control over their content or availability.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [FYI] Should Anonymity Be Illegal?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>
- Re: [FYI] Should Anonymity Be Illegal?
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de>

References:
- [FYI] Should Anonymity Be Illegal?
  - From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@t-online.de>
- Re: [FYI] Should Anonymity Be Illegal?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>
- Re: [FYI] Should Anonymity Be Illegal?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Panopticon und Echelon...
Next by Date: Re: [FYI] Metallica, Segmentierung und Konvergenz
Prev by thread: Re: [FYI] Should Anonymity Be Illegal?
Next by thread: Re: [FYI] Should Anonymity Be Illegal?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread