[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Universal Networking Language (fwd)

John Cowan wrote:

> Sounds pretty crude and primitive compared to Lojban.

How do you see a possibility of outperforming the UNL vaporware?
E.g. as a first step: write a parser that outputs intelligible English? 
That would add great momentum to Lojban and make learning much easier too.

Hartmut Pilch