[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [iesg-secretary@ietf.org: The IETF's position on technology to support legal intercept]
- To: Ulf Möller <ulf@fitug.de>
- Subject: Re: [iesg-secretary@ietf.org: The IETF's position on technology to support legal intercept]
- From: Wau Holland <wau@minos.trend.jena.thur.de>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 16:36:54 +0200
- Cc: debate@fitug.de, krypto@thur.de
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <19991012025211.A3002@epsilon>; from Ulf Möller on Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 02:52:11AM +0200
- References: <19991012025211.A3002@epsilon>
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 02:52:11AM +0200, Ulf Möller wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message from The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> -----
>
> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> To: IETF-Announce: ;
> cc: raven@ietf.org
> Subject: The IETF's position on technology to support legal intercept
> Reply-to: raven@ietf.org
> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 15:47:10 -0400
>
>
> The use of the Internet for services that replace or supplement
> traditional telephony is, predictably, causing discussions in many
> countries about the point at which special rules about telephony
> services begin to apply to Internet service providers. In many
> countries, these rules could impose new legal obligations on ISPs,
> particularly requirements to comply with requests from law enforcement
> agencies or regulators to intercept, or gather and report other
> information about, communications. For example many traditional
...
Ist RFC 1984 nicht ausreichend?
w "ein Anfang ist da schon gemacht" au