[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WG: [ICANN-EU] Answers to Questions by Svensson and Roessler
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: WG: [ICANN-EU] Answers to Questions by Svensson and Roessler
- From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- Date: 16 Aug 2000 08:10:41 GMT
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Newsgroups: iks.lists.icann.europe
- Organization: IKS GmbH Jena
- References: <LPBBLHJOPFFLBPKPOHCKMEFLCCAA.SchultzKom@t-online.de>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
- User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX)
* Christian Schultz Kommunalberatung wrote:
>As an elected member of the board I will stand with priority for the
>creation of a top-level-domain "eu" for Europe. I think, this would be the
>right policy in the interest of all users in europe.
eu.int is enough. Where do you see a reason for this priority?
>P.S.: Warum können wir nicht auch in deutsch miteinander kommunizieren? Die
>rd. 20.000 deutschen At-Large-Mitglieder würden vielleicht noch mit mehr
>Interesse mitmachen.
[Why don't we communicate in German? About 25,000 German @Large members
would be better involved.]
ICANN is a international organisation. All candidates should be able to
communicate in the de facto standard language. In order to keep equal
chances for every candidate, national differences (especially language ones)
should be minimized.
Spelling errors are mine and should not be sold.