[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ICANN-EU] FW: Domain Name Survey for At Large Member Nominees
- To: Hans Peter Dittler <hpdittler@braintec-consult.de>
- Subject: RE: [ICANN-EU] FW: Domain Name Survey for At Large Member Nominees
- From: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:29:32 +0200 (MEST)
- cc: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <009401c0079e$b97e4020$0140a8c0@braintecconsult.de>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Hans Peter Dittler wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Hans Peter Dittler wrote:
> >>1. Speculation and the Aftermarket Industry
[...]
> Good names are great for marketing, short names even better.
> I have no problem with inventing and even selling of names as a
> valuable service to others. It is for me like many other forms
> of marketing and advertisement business. Even the names of at least
> two of the companies I am working for (including BRAINTEC) were
> developed by marketing people or agencies who got paid for it.
So it is alright to pay marketing people to develop a name for you?
They aren't cheap.
> But I don't like blocking of other people or companies by
> registering hundreds of names and putting a huge price-tag
> on them just in hope of a big profit.
But it is wrong to spend less on marketing (because it is not
necessary) and pay for a good name?
I am lost here. Why can marketing people make money for selling a name off
to the customers, while "speculators" cannot make money on good names they
thought of first?
--
Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl
marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org