Re: AW: [ICANN-EU] ICANN elections statistics, v1.0

["Griffini Giorgio" <grigio@mediapoint.it>]

You wrote:

> Dear Vittorio,
> 
> Thank you for your very good site, easy to read and still better as the
> "official" ICANN-site.
> I wonder why you succeeded in this and Icann not.

I think I have an explanation for this :)
If I remember well I'read in a election committee raccomendation that 
members should be presented by alphabeticaly sorted by last name and 
also ICANN web site publishing is also bound to fulfill 'corporate identity' 
issues (Fonts, logos and so on) so any change must be 'approved' .... 
I agree the Vittorio Bertola stat pages are a nice good job and allow to 
smooth trend on getting 'nervous' about endorsements especially to top 
running candidates and also for <3 digits endorsed canditates like me :))

In the sake of 'fairness'  (and as a follow-up to C.S.Chassapis hints)  I think 
that wording ' Currently satifying nomination thresold' may be better than 
'Currently nominated'..... Pls allow room for any of us to have some little bit 
hope :)) 

Best regards
Giorgio Griffini