Re: [ICANN-EU] Intermediate european body

["Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@medea.wz-berlin.de>]

Jefsey,


> I am afraid you missed my point. 
Perhaps you missed mine ;-)

The question was about the
> European Director, not about the second candidate favored by
> @large europeans. 

My answer was about Andy. The point I tried to make, perhaps a bit 
too indirectly, is that we (Andy and I, that is) do agree on the 
necessity of a european council -  and also on most other aspects 
related to the at-large membership we've discussed so far. 
 

May be you forgot about the 5 NomComs

True, you have a point here. 

> and CCC? I am not accustomed to be accused of nonsense :-)

Sorry about that, impulsive reaction. There have been quite a bit of 
unjustified reproaches against Andy on this list. By chance I jumped 
on this one ;-)
To put it more generally: We've to cooperate if we want to get the at-
large membership firmly established. I'd wish we wouldn't make things 
more difficult by personal hostilities. All of us have enough experience 
with mailing lists to know about the inevitable consequences. 

> so it makes me feel younger. Thx!

You're welcome! ;-)

jeanette

> 
> At 17:44 29/08/00, you wrote:
> 
> > > Roberto,
> > > 1) on 8/13 I proposed to work an EUROCANN something from this
> > >      list. I happy it takes momentum if it is oppen to all
> > >      candidates, not - as it has been discussed - with the most
> > >      endorsed ones.
> >
> > > 2) however I am afraid the one who may be against it is the selected
> > >     director. We should therefore think of the intermediary
> > >     strcuture in taking this into account.
> >
> >Jefsey, this is really nonsense! I can assure you that Andy would want
> >some sort of council too. We've talked about his issue quite
> >frequently.
> >
> >Most of his time seems to be consumed by the ongoing debate on
> >content filtering lately. Moreover, both of us get a lot of inquiries
> >by the German press. This too eats up quite a bit of attention...
> >jeanette
>